Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Kazakhstan
52.1%
in 2021
South Africa
51.0%
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
5th
South Africa rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Africa
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 52.1% against 51.0% in South Africa, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.8% | 45.4% | 10.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 53.2% | 50.1% | 3.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Kazakhstan or South Africa?
- Kazakhstan, at 52.1% against 51.0% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 1.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Kazakhstan ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group