Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
42.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
44.1%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
12th
Mongolia rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 44.1% against 42.9% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 31 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.3% | 28.6% | 6.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 47.4% | 44.1% | 3.3% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 44.1% against 42.9% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 1.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group