Poland vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Poland
44.5%
in 2019
Uruguay
49.2%
in 2022
Poland rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Poland
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.2% against 44.5% in Poland, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uruguay ahead.
Poland ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.2% | 39.1% | 2.9% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 40.1% | 44.6% | 4.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Poland or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.2% against 44.5% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Poland and Uruguay?
- 4.7%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Poland ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group