Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Kazakhstan
40.8%
in 2021
South Africa
42.6%
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
6th
South Africa rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 42.6% against 40.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 4th of 34 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.0% | 42.7% | 14.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 41.5% | 48.1% | 6.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Kazakhstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 42.6% against 40.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 1.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Kazakhstan ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group