Peru vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Peru
12.6%
in 2022
Serbia
12.4%
in 2022
Peru rank
31st
Serbia rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 12.6% against 12.4% in Serbia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.1% | 30.7% | 17.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12.7% | 10.9% | 1.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 12.6% against 12.4% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Peru ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group