Ecuador vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Ecuador
14.0%
in 2022
Serbia
12.4%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
29th
Serbia rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 14.0% against 12.4% in Serbia, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.0% | 26.9% | 8.0% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 13.3% | 10.9% | 2.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 14.0% against 12.4% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 1.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group