Dominican Republic vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Dominican Republic
22.1%
in 2021
Mongolia
33.7%
in 2020
Dominican Republic rank
11th
Mongolia rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 33.7% against 22.1% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.1% | 13.6% | 8.6% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 16.1% | 22.1% | 6.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Dominican Republic or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 33.7% against 22.1% in Dominican Republic as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 11.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group