Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
50.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
43.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 50.4% against 43.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.6% | 50.2% | 8.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 54.6% | 43.9% | 10.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 50.4% against 43.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group