El Salvador vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
16.5%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
20.1%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
21st
Kazakhstan rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 20.1% against 16.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 32.3% | 10.5% | 21.7% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 16.8% | 20.1% | 3.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 20.1% against 16.5% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 3.6%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group