Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Dominican Republic
24.6%
in 2021
Serbia
21.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Serbia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 24.6% against 21.5% in Serbia, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.9% | 30.7% | 7.8% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 33.7% | 17.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 24.6% | 11.6% | 13.1% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Dominican Republic, at 24.6% against 21.5% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 3.1%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group