South Africa vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
South Africa
58.1%
in 2021
Uruguay
55.1%
in 2022
South Africa rank
7th
Uruguay rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- South Africa
- Uruguay
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 58.1% against 55.1% in Uruguay, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Uruguay ahead.
South Africa ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.8% | 61.8% | 11.0% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 60.2% | 54.1% | 6.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, South Africa or Uruguay?
- South Africa, at 58.1% against 55.1% in Uruguay as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between South Africa and Uruguay?
- 3.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- South Africa ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group