Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
60.8%
in 2020
Uruguay
55.1%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
6th
Uruguay rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 60.8% against 55.1% in Uruguay, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 36.9% | 2.9% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 40.9% | 43.6% | 2.7% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 60.8% | 57.4% | 3.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 60.8% against 55.1% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 5.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group