Costa Rica vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
41.2%
in 2022
Peru
39.4%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
18th
Peru rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Peru
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 41.2% against 39.4% in Peru, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Peru ranks 20th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.3% | 37.0% | 4.7% | Peru |
| 2010s | 36.0% | 36.3% | 0.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 42.5% | 40.0% | 2.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Peru?
- Costa Rica, at 41.2% against 39.4% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Peru?
- 1.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Peru ranks 20th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group