Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
41.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
39.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 41.2% against 39.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.1% | 43.2% | 6.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 45.0% | 39.9% | 5.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 41.2% against 39.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.3%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group