Brazil vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
63.4%
in 2022
South Africa
58.1%
in 2021
Brazil rank
5th
South Africa rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 63.4% against 58.1% in South Africa, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 64.0% | 50.8% | 13.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 57.9% | 60.2% | 2.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or South Africa?
- Brazil, at 63.4% against 58.1% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and South Africa?
- 5.3%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group