Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
63.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
60.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
5th
Mongolia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 63.4% against 60.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 5th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.9% | 34.0% | 15.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 57.7% | 44.0% | 13.6% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 57.3% | 60.8% | 3.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 63.4% against 60.8% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 5th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group