Paraguay vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Paraguay
42.2%
in 2022
Serbia
41.0%
in 2022
Paraguay rank
13th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Paraguay
- Serbia
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 42.2% against 41.0% in Serbia, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.0% | 40.6% | 3.4% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 37.8% | 42.6% | 4.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 38.4% | 40.6% | 2.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Paraguay or Serbia?
- Paraguay, at 42.2% against 41.0% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Paraguay and Serbia?
- 1.2%, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Paraguay ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group