Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
41.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
43.3%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
14th
Mongolia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 43.3% against 41.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 33.5% | 28.9% | 4.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 45.4% | 43.3% | 2.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 43.3% against 41.4% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 1.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group