Chile vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
25.4%
in 2022
El Salvador
20.8%
in 2022
Chile rank
30th
El Salvador rank
33rd
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25.4% against 20.8% in El Salvador, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was El Salvador ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and El Salvador ranks 33rd of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.0% | 38.9% | 9.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 26.0% | 33.0% | 7.0% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 25.4% | 20.8% | 4.6% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 25.4% against 20.8% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and El Salvador?
- 4.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 30th and El Salvador ranks 33rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group