Belarus vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Belarus
44.3%
in 2019
Brazil
45.0%
in 2022
Belarus rank
9th
Brazil rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Belarus
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 45.0% against 44.3% in Belarus, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Brazil ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.8% | 49.6% | 13.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 43.0% | 46.4% | 3.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Belarus or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 45.0% against 44.3% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Belarus and Brazil?
- 0.7%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Brazil ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group