Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kazakhstan
20.2%
in 2021
Serbia
23.5%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
17th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 23.5% against 20.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.6% | 30.0% | 17.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 20.2% | 15.2% | 5.0% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 23.5% against 20.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 3.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group