Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
25.2%
in 2021
Serbia
23.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 25.2% against 23.5% in Serbia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.0% | 23.0% | 1.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 21.9% | 31.7% | 9.8% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 25.2% | 15.2% | 9.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Dominican Republic, at 25.2% against 23.5% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 1.7%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group