Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kosovo
55.3%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
55.6%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.6% against 55.3% in Kosovo, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.3% | 29.0% | 49.2% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 49.0% | 44.5% | 4.6% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.6% against 55.3% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group