Dominican Republic vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
22.2%
in 2021
Mongolia
20.5%
in 2020
Dominican Republic rank
16th
Mongolia rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Mongolia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 22.2% against 20.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.0% | 17.8% | 3.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 18.2% | 15.2% | 3.0% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Dominican Republic or Mongolia?
- Dominican Republic, at 22.2% against 20.5% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 1.7%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group