Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Kyrgyzstan
43.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
49.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Uruguay rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.5% against 43.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.0% | 53.4% | 9.4% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 43.0% | 51.9% | 8.8% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.5% against 43.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 6.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group