Honduras vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Honduras
47.1%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
43.0%
in 2020
Honduras rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Honduras
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 47.1% against 43.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Honduras or Kyrgyzstan?
- Honduras, at 47.1% against 43.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Honduras and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.1%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Honduras ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group