Chile vs Paraguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
35.4%
in 2022
Paraguay
34.3%
in 2022
Chile rank
25th
Paraguay rank
27th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 35.4% against 34.3% in Paraguay, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Paraguay ahead.
Chile ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 27th of 34 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.7% | 46.2% | 11.5% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 29.2% | 40.2% | 11.0% | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 32.5% | 32.8% | 0.3% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Paraguay?
- Chile, at 35.4% against 34.3% in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Paraguay?
- 1.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 27th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group