Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
35.4%
in 2022
Panama
30.0%
in 2023
Chile rank
25th
Panama rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Chile currently reports 35.4% against 30.0% in Panama, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 25th and Panama ranks 28th of 34 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.7% | 37.6% | 2.9% | Panama |
| 2010s | 29.2% | 34.0% | 4.8% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Panama?
- Chile, at 35.4% against 30.0% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Panama?
- 5.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 25th and Panama ranks 28th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group