Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
51.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
52.0%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Mongolia rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 52.0% against 51.4% in Brazil, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.3% | 40.8% | 16.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 55.6% | 42.5% | 13.1% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 48.3% | 52.0% | 3.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 52.0% against 51.4% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 0.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group