Armenia vs Dominican Republic: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
40.4%
in 2022
Dominican Republic
36.8%
in 2021
Armenia rank
19th
Dominican Republic rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 40.4% against 36.8% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.7% | 30.5% | 2.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 38.7% | 31.8% | 7.0% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 45.8% | 36.8% | 9.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Dominican Republic?
- Armenia, at 40.4% against 36.8% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 3.6%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Dominican Republic rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group