Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Kyrgyzstan
50.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
49.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Uruguay rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 50.0% against 49.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.9% | 53.2% | 4.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 50.0% | 51.5% | 1.4% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 50.0% against 49.0% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group