Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Kazakhstan
64.5%
in 2021
Serbia
67.1%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 67.1% against 64.5% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.6%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6% | 54.6% | 41.0% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 54.2% | 70.8% | 16.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 64.5% | 72.2% | 7.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 67.1% against 64.5% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 2.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group