Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Dominican Republic
37.9%
in 2021
Honduras
36.1%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
21st
Honduras rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 37.9% against 36.1% in Honduras, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Honduras ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.6% | 29.1% | 0.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 31.4% | 30.1% | 1.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Dominican Republic, at 37.9% against 36.1% in Honduras as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 1.8%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Honduras ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group