Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Colombia
46.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
46.6%
in 2020
Colombia rank
15th
Mongolia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 46.6% against 46.5% in Colombia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.0% | 38.4% | 1.4% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 55.4% | 46.6% | 8.8% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 46.6% against 46.5% in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 0.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Colombia ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group