Chile vs Paraguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
33.5%
in 2022
Paraguay
33.1%
in 2022
Chile rank
25th
Paraguay rank
26th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33.5% against 33.1% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Paraguay ahead.
Chile ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 26th of 34 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.6% | 35.6% | 0.9% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 28.9% | 36.9% | 8.0% | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 31.7% | 34.0% | 2.3% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Paraguay?
- Chile, at 33.5% against 33.1% in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Paraguay?
- 0.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 26th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group