Chile vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
33.5%
in 2022
Honduras
36.1%
in 2019
Chile rank
25th
Honduras rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 36.1% against 33.5% in Chile, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 25th and Honduras ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.6% | 27.5% | 7.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 28.9% | 30.0% | 1.1% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 36.1% against 33.5% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Honduras?
- 2.6%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Honduras?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 25th and Honduras ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group