Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
49.1%
in 2022
Mongolia
46.6%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Mongolia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 49.1% against 46.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.1% | 38.5% | 18.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 54.6% | 40.6% | 14.1% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 46.7% | 46.6% | 0.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 49.1% against 46.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.5%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group