Armenia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
45.7%
in 2022
Uruguay
49.0%
in 2022
Armenia rank
16th
Uruguay rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.0% against 45.7% in Armenia, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uruguay ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.9% | 44.9% | 10.0% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 41.2% | 52.3% | 11.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 50.9% | 50.6% | 0.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.0% against 45.7% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Uruguay?
- 3.3%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group