Argentina vs Armenia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Argentina
39.8%
in 2022
Armenia
45.7%
in 2022
Argentina rank
18th
Armenia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Argentina
- Armenia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 45.7% against 39.8% in Argentina, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 18th and Armenia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Armenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.0% | 40.4% | 5.6% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 40.2% | 50.9% | 10.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Argentina or Armenia?
- Armenia, at 45.7% against 39.8% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Argentina and Armenia?
- 5.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Armenia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Armenia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Argentina ranks 18th and Armenia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group