Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
59.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
64.8%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
9th
Uruguay rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 64.8% against 59.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 9th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.3% | 45.4% | 5.1% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 44.2% | 52.2% | 8.0% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 59.1% | 70.9% | 11.9% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 64.8% against 59.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 5.7%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 9th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group