Dominican Republic vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Dominican Republic
41.1%
in 2019
Panama
35.6%
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
22nd
Panama rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Dominican Republic
- Panama
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 41.1% against 35.6% in Panama, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Panama ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 22nd and Panama ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.2% | 43.0% | 14.8% | Panama |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 32.9% | 5.6% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Dominican Republic or Panama?
- Dominican Republic, at 41.1% against 35.6% in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Dominican Republic and Panama?
- 5.5%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Dominican Republic ranks 22nd and Panama ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group