Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
45.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
41.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 45.5% against 41.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.9% | 45.4% | 6.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 47.3% | 41.9% | 5.4% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 45.5% against 41.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.6%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group