Brazil vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
62.9%
in 2022
South Africa
69.4%
in 2021
Brazil rank
8th
South Africa rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 69.4% against 62.9% in Brazil, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 31 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.5% | 69.2% | 2.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 58.8% | 62.8% | 4.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 69.4% against 62.9% in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and South Africa?
- 6.5%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group