Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
62.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
59.1%
in 2020
Brazil rank
8th
Mongolia rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 62.9% against 59.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.9% | 40.3% | 15.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 61.3% | 47.0% | 14.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 54.9% | 59.1% | 4.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 62.9% against 59.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 3.8%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group