Armenia vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
33.6%
in 2022
Panama
35.6%
in 2023
Armenia rank
25th
Panama rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 35.6% against 33.6% in Armenia, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Panama ahead.
Armenia ranks 25th and Panama ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.1% | 43.0% | 11.9% | Panama |
| 2010s | 36.8% | 34.2% | 2.6% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 35.5% | 34.9% | 0.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Panama?
- Panama, at 35.6% against 33.6% in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Panama?
- 2.0%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Panama?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 25th and Panama ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group