Serbia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Serbia
52.6%
in 2022
Uruguay
54.0%
in 2022
Serbia rank
11th
Uruguay rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 54.0% against 52.6% in Serbia, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.3% | 54.6% | 2.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 53.9% | 54.3% | 0.4% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 54.0% against 52.6% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 1.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Serbia ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group