Chile vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
28.1%
in 2022
Peru
30.9%
in 2022
Chile rank
31st
Peru rank
29th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 30.9% against 28.1% in Chile, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 31st and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.2% | 32.9% | 2.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 30.0% | 27.9% | 2.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 34.7% | 4.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Peru?
- Peru, at 30.9% against 28.1% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Peru?
- 2.8%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 31st and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group