Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
53.3%
in 2022
Serbia
52.6%
in 2022
Brazil rank
10th
Serbia rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 53.3% against 52.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.5% | 51.6% | 3.8% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 53.4% | 53.9% | 0.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 53.3% against 52.6% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Serbia?
- 0.7%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group