Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
53.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
49.5%
in 2020
Brazil rank
10th
Mongolia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 53.3% against 49.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.6% | 35.7% | 20.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 55.7% | 37.4% | 18.3% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 53.9% | 49.5% | 4.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 53.3% against 49.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 3.8%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group