Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kazakhstan
19.8%
in 2021
Serbia
20.3%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.3% against 19.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.6% | 28.5% | 15.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 19.8% | 18.7% | 1.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.3% against 19.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group